<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gameslaw.net &#187; &#8220;Activision Six&#8221; stealth lawsuits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gameslaw.net/category/main/law/lawsuits/activision-six-stealth-lawsuits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gameslaw.net</link>
	<description>In-depth legal analysis and news for video games and virtual worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:10:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A note on Activision&#8217;s stealth lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/23/a-note-on-activisions-stealth-lawsuits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/23/a-note-on-activisions-stealth-lawsuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Activision Six" stealth lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes we&#8217;re aware of them. No, we won&#8217;t be reporting on them until they &#8220;unstealth&#8221; themselves, and substantive information comes out about them. The litigation is still pending, as are settlement negotiations in some of the cases as far (says GamePolitics), and given that intimidation tactics are reportedly being used against the defendants to browbeat [...]<p><a href="http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/23/a-note-on-activisions-stealth-lawsuits/">A note on Activision&#8217;s stealth lawsuits</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.gameslaw.net">gameslaw.net</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we&#8217;re aware of them. No, we won&#8217;t be reporting on them until they &#8220;unstealth&#8221; themselves, and substantive information comes out about them. The litigation is still pending, as are settlement negotiations in some of the cases as far (says GamePolitics), and given that intimidation tactics are reportedly being used against the defendants to browbeat them into a settlement, we don&#8217;t want any speculation on our part to potentially influence the outcome of this case.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/23/a-note-on-activisions-stealth-lawsuits/">A note on Activision&#8217;s stealth lawsuits</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.gameslaw.net">gameslaw.net</a></p>
<img src="http://blog.gameslaw.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=216&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/23/a-note-on-activisions-stealth-lawsuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
