<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massive collection of Jack Thompson&#8217;s recent filings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/</link>
	<description>In-depth legal analysis and news for video games and virtual worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:05:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Bentsen</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Bentsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Mr. Thompson, I&#039;ve known many many fine lawyers in my life and you, sir, are no lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Thompson, I&#8217;ve known many many fine lawyers in my life and you, sir, are no lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Welder</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Welder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Jack,

Since you&#039;re such a smart guy you must already realize that Goebbels wasn&#039;t tried at Nuremburg seeing as how he killed his family and himself before he was captured.  I know facts tend to be pretty meaningless to you, but I just thought I&#039;d point this out.

Also, your pleadings show why you were disbarred...filled with ad hominem attacks and pointless &quot;evidence.&quot;  If somebody else is breaking the law, as you submit (they&#039;re not, but for the sake of argument let&#039;s say they are), that does not give you license to behave like a jackass in and out of court.  Religion, also, does not give you license to behave like a jackass in and out of court.  (In fact, I&#039;m pretty sure your Bible has rules about not behaving like a jerk.)

You are not being singled out because you are Christian.  You are not being singled out because you wrote a very poorly written book.  You are not being targeted by the gays.  You are not being targeted by the &quot;porn&quot; industry.  You are not being targeted by the game industry.

You have been called out to be disbarred due to your utter lack of competence, your inability to compose yourself in a court of law, your refusal to follow simple instructions from the court, and your complete inability to follow legal procedures.

It&#039;s actually pretty hilarious that you lack the legal skill to get yourself removed from a case.  I&#039;m sure Salomon is happy to have you on his side.  LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>Since you&#8217;re such a smart guy you must already realize that Goebbels wasn&#8217;t tried at Nuremburg seeing as how he killed his family and himself before he was captured.  I know facts tend to be pretty meaningless to you, but I just thought I&#8217;d point this out.</p>
<p>Also, your pleadings show why you were disbarred&#8230;filled with ad hominem attacks and pointless &#8220;evidence.&#8221;  If somebody else is breaking the law, as you submit (they&#8217;re not, but for the sake of argument let&#8217;s say they are), that does not give you license to behave like a jackass in and out of court.  Religion, also, does not give you license to behave like a jackass in and out of court.  (In fact, I&#8217;m pretty sure your Bible has rules about not behaving like a jerk.)</p>
<p>You are not being singled out because you are Christian.  You are not being singled out because you wrote a very poorly written book.  You are not being targeted by the gays.  You are not being targeted by the &#8220;porn&#8221; industry.  You are not being targeted by the game industry.</p>
<p>You have been called out to be disbarred due to your utter lack of competence, your inability to compose yourself in a court of law, your refusal to follow simple instructions from the court, and your complete inability to follow legal procedures.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s actually pretty hilarious that you lack the legal skill to get yourself removed from a case.  I&#8217;m sure Salomon is happy to have you on his side.  LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Well, Jack is right about one thing; they weren&#039;t defense filings. 

Other than that, though, my post still stands on its merits (none of which have been substantively addressed by Thompson).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Jack is right about one thing; they weren&#8217;t defense filings. </p>
<p>Other than that, though, my post still stands on its merits (none of which have been substantively addressed by Thompson).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BearDogg-X</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>BearDogg-X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Get over yourself, Metropolitian Moron of Miami.

You did have &quot;Due process&quot;, but you were the one who left the proceedings because they wouldn&#039;t let you turn said proceedings into a circus by addressing the audience rather than the judge. Also, you chose to file your documents with the court &lt;b&gt;without getting another attorney to sign it by order of said court&lt;/b&gt;.

Practice what you preach: Grow up and get a life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get over yourself, Metropolitian Moron of Miami.</p>
<p>You did have &#8220;Due process&#8221;, but you were the one who left the proceedings because they wouldn&#8217;t let you turn said proceedings into a circus by addressing the audience rather than the judge. Also, you chose to file your documents with the court <b>without getting another attorney to sign it by order of said court</b>.</p>
<p>Practice what you preach: Grow up and get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Surette</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Surette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Errr.....well I guess the MPRE would start having essay questions just for you lol   &gt;_&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errr&#8230;..well I guess the MPRE would start having essay questions just for you lol   &gt;_&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Surette</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Surette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Oh Former Attorney Thompson, you are a living, breathing MPRE essay question. Come to think of it, that might make a good article of mine one of these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Former Attorney Thompson, you are a living, breathing MPRE essay question. Come to think of it, that might make a good article of mine one of these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flipside</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Flipside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Oh, he does pay attention, he just doesn&#039;t respond when someone has a point ;) It&#039;s been his habit for years, he&#039;ll make a bunch of accusations and insults and then mysteriously vanish the moment someone proves him wrong, that&#039;s why he stormed out of that hearing, it was the real-life version of refusing to respond to any valid points raised about his arguments.

Thompson&#039;s spent his entire life running away or trying to avoid responsibility, which is why he tries to help other people do the same, to justify his own actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, he does pay attention, he just doesn&#8217;t respond when someone has a point <img src='http://blog.gameslaw.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s been his habit for years, he&#8217;ll make a bunch of accusations and insults and then mysteriously vanish the moment someone proves him wrong, that&#8217;s why he stormed out of that hearing, it was the real-life version of refusing to respond to any valid points raised about his arguments.</p>
<p>Thompson&#8217;s spent his entire life running away or trying to avoid responsibility, which is why he tries to help other people do the same, to justify his own actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Surette</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Surette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Aw forget it he&#039;s not paying attention</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw forget it he&#8217;s not paying attention</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nightwng2000</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>nightwng2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-106</guid>
		<description>As Dan points out, Parts 1-4 are the full docket now in Zip format to help you Mac users have access.

The RAR update contains the two documents filed on the 17th and they are also located in the Part 4 Zip file.  I had emailed the RAR update first and Dan said he uses a Mac and that Zip can be read by Macs.

Future updates will be in Zip format.  I don&#039;t have WinAce installed and WinRar can compress to either RAR or Zip.

Dan looks like he&#039;s having a great time with these documents.  :)

And on the big exhibit pdf from yesterday is actually a group of exhibit reports John Bruce filed.  The group of reports totals almost 360 pages.  It&#039;s easier to download all documents in one pdf file than a bunch of seperate ones.  Besides, these reports can easily be found online.  Including the FTC 2007 report... as well as the several prior year FTC reports which, when view one after the other, show marked IMPROVMENT over the years in regards to retail sales of video games.  But, hey, that wouldn&#039;t help John Bruce&#039;s case to tell The Truth, The WHOLE Truth, And Nothing But The Truth.  If he swears that the contents of his Motion are are complete, and he fails to give ALL the reports showing the improvment over time, does that mean he lied in that oath?

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Dan points out, Parts 1-4 are the full docket now in Zip format to help you Mac users have access.</p>
<p>The RAR update contains the two documents filed on the 17th and they are also located in the Part 4 Zip file.  I had emailed the RAR update first and Dan said he uses a Mac and that Zip can be read by Macs.</p>
<p>Future updates will be in Zip format.  I don&#8217;t have WinAce installed and WinRar can compress to either RAR or Zip.</p>
<p>Dan looks like he&#8217;s having a great time with these documents.  <img src='http://blog.gameslaw.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And on the big exhibit pdf from yesterday is actually a group of exhibit reports John Bruce filed.  The group of reports totals almost 360 pages.  It&#8217;s easier to download all documents in one pdf file than a bunch of seperate ones.  Besides, these reports can easily be found online.  Including the FTC 2007 report&#8230; as well as the several prior year FTC reports which, when view one after the other, show marked IMPROVMENT over the years in regards to retail sales of video games.  But, hey, that wouldn&#8217;t help John Bruce&#8217;s case to tell The Truth, The WHOLE Truth, And Nothing But The Truth.  If he swears that the contents of his Motion are are complete, and he fails to give ALL the reports showing the improvment over time, does that mean he lied in that oath?</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flipside</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/10/18/massive-collection-of-jack-thompsons-recent-defense-filings/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Flipside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=290#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Ah, so we were right all these years, you DO Google your own name every day. Thanks for the admission.

So because you Google yourself every day, these people are obsessed? It&#039;s only the fact you keep posting your somewhat pathetic responses that has promoted any interest whatsoever, which you well know, since that is precisely why you do it :)

Our fascination with you is sort of like the way crowds gather around someone standing on top of a huge building. It&#039;s fascination with horrible, complete, and unremitting disasters, one of the more strange habits of the human race, but one that nonetheless exists, and you are the perfect example.

And how can you have due process with someone who cries like a baby and storms out of hearings? Kind of hard to do that when the accused is sulking because he didn&#039;t get his own way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, so we were right all these years, you DO Google your own name every day. Thanks for the admission.</p>
<p>So because you Google yourself every day, these people are obsessed? It&#8217;s only the fact you keep posting your somewhat pathetic responses that has promoted any interest whatsoever, which you well know, since that is precisely why you do it <img src='http://blog.gameslaw.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Our fascination with you is sort of like the way crowds gather around someone standing on top of a huge building. It&#8217;s fascination with horrible, complete, and unremitting disasters, one of the more strange habits of the human race, but one that nonetheless exists, and you are the perfect example.</p>
<p>And how can you have due process with someone who cries like a baby and storms out of hearings? Kind of hard to do that when the accused is sulking because he didn&#8217;t get his own way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
