<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jack Thompson disbarred</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/28/jack-thompson-disbarred/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/28/jack-thompson-disbarred/</link>
	<description>In-depth legal analysis and news for video games and virtual worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:59:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liz Surette</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/28/jack-thompson-disbarred/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Surette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=220#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Thompson has no procedural due process claim here. The right to a law license is not fundamental, and this disbarment is more than rationally related to the state&#039;s legitimate interest in stopping those who abuse our legal profession for personal gain and petty vendettas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thompson has no procedural due process claim here. The right to a law license is not fundamental, and this disbarment is more than rationally related to the state&#8217;s legitimate interest in stopping those who abuse our legal profession for personal gain and petty vendettas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/28/jack-thompson-disbarred/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=220#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Yeah but you gotta keep in mind, that&#039;s how Jack works. He&#039;s not in it for law. He&#039;s not in it to zealously represent his clients. He&#039;s in it for the lulz. For the drama. He already feels that the legal community is against him so what&#039;s the big deal for him to lose his license? He now gets to make an even bigger stink about it, quite literally &quot;making a federal case&quot; out of it. That&#039;s what he really wants.

It&#039;s not, and never was, about his right to practice law. Only about his desire to be heard. And just like any petulant child who doesn&#039;t get to be heard, now he&#039;s having a tantrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but you gotta keep in mind, that&#8217;s how Jack works. He&#8217;s not in it for law. He&#8217;s not in it to zealously represent his clients. He&#8217;s in it for the lulz. For the drama. He already feels that the legal community is against him so what&#8217;s the big deal for him to lose his license? He now gets to make an even bigger stink about it, quite literally &#8220;making a federal case&#8221; out of it. That&#8217;s what he really wants.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not, and never was, about his right to practice law. Only about his desire to be heard. And just like any petulant child who doesn&#8217;t get to be heard, now he&#8217;s having a tantrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/28/jack-thompson-disbarred/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=220#comment-35</guid>
		<description>My &quot;right to practice law&quot; comment was directed more in response to Thompson&#039;s responses to the disbarment. His comments tend to suggest that he believes some great personal right is denied to him by the disbarment. &quot;This is when it gets fun...&quot; I mean come ON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My &#8220;right to practice law&#8221; comment was directed more in response to Thompson&#8217;s responses to the disbarment. His comments tend to suggest that he believes some great personal right is denied to him by the disbarment. &#8220;This is when it gets fun&#8230;&#8221; I mean come ON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/28/jack-thompson-disbarred/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=220#comment-34</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very good thing that &quot;this&quot; attorney was disbarred, however it&#039;s not a good thing in general that any attorney is disbarred. We&#039;d have been a lot better off had Thompson&#039;s behavior never been so outrageous as to come to this. Nobody is disputing that there is no right to a law license; however I&#039;m saying that it&#039;s never a good thing when someone&#039;s actions get to the point that they need to even face the inquiry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very good thing that &#8220;this&#8221; attorney was disbarred, however it&#8217;s not a good thing in general that any attorney is disbarred. We&#8217;d have been a lot better off had Thompson&#8217;s behavior never been so outrageous as to come to this. Nobody is disputing that there is no right to a law license; however I&#8217;m saying that it&#8217;s never a good thing when someone&#8217;s actions get to the point that they need to even face the inquiry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Surette</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/28/jack-thompson-disbarred/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Surette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=220#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I hear he&#039;s pursuing a second career as a weatherman. At least then he can still have something to blame for the world&#039;s ills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear he&#8217;s pursuing a second career as a weatherman. At least then he can still have something to blame for the world&#8217;s ills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.gameslaw.net/2008/09/28/jack-thompson-disbarred/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/?p=220#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I beg to differ. In this case it is a very good thing that an attorney was disbarred. No one is entitled to a law license, especially not someone so profoundly incompetent. A license to practice law is a privilege, not a right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ. In this case it is a very good thing that an attorney was disbarred. No one is entitled to a law license, especially not someone so profoundly incompetent. A license to practice law is a privilege, not a right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
